MES 30 Analog Mod that "Sucks" (literally) *initial pics*

  • Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
SMF is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

jwed980

Fire Starter
Original poster
Oct 19, 2017
35
6
Greetings All,

I've been tinkering with my ideas for this model for some time, and now that it's nearly done - I just couldn't resist throwing out a couple of teaser photos until I have time for my first real smoke with it.

20171203_162434a.jpg


20171203_162509a.jpg


20171203_162727b.jpg


20171203_163040b.jpg


By now everyone probably knows that with the factory setup on the MES 30 Analog, airflow is nearly non-existent and non-adjustable. While it works and does what it was designed to do (more or less) - it's just not how *I* wanted it to work.

As the subject line indicates, this mod "sucks" - that is to say it uses a miniscule amount of compressed air and a homemade venturi to create negative pressure at the factory exhaust port, thus pulling the (hopefully clean) smoke from an external "mailbox mod" and on through the smoker cabinet.

The venturi consists of a 3/8" tee fitting, a 3/8" modified barbed fitting, and a short length of 3/8" brass pipe. The barbed fitting was modified by fitting it with a length of small diameter brass tubing.

Pulling the smoke through the cabinet requires it to be relatively well sealed, so the form-in-place RTV gasket method was employed on the door following the "gutting and insulating" phase of this project. (Thanks to dward51 for the fantastic pics/writeup of his "MES custom SS model" from which I drew some inspiration).

I also felt more comfortable utilizing two toggle latches on the door in lieu of the single original as supplied from the factory.

There are some signifigant gaps that leak air through the area where the factory temp controller plugs into the element that had to be addressed. Luckily, a bit of 3/8" fiberglass rope stove gasket stuffed in there took care of it.

Of course, I *had* to build a PID controller for it...

"Ports" for the thermocouple and auxilliary temperature probes were made from brass 1/2" x 1-1/8" pipe nipples and conduit locking rings. Same for the smoke inlet port except a longer nipple was used and the diameter of the outboard end was turned-down using a mini-lathe for a better fit inside the vinyl smoke inlet tube.

Joining sleeves for standard 3/4" copper pipe were cut to 0.710" lengths and used as spacers for the nipples between the inner and outer walls of the enclosure. This allows the locking rings to secure each nipple tightly without pulling the enclosure walls together. A spacer was also used on the factory exhaust vent.

A mini-lathe was used to make the aluminum adapter that allows the thermocouple probe to plug right into the ports. I allowed for a couple of different probe locations just in case, although I had to again use the lathe to make the ID of all the nipples match for a precise slip-fit with the probe adapter.

I performed preliminary testing by attaching a Dwyer #460 Air Gauge to the smoke inlet port on the lower left side. I bought this gauge years ago to tune/maintain my fuel oil furnace, and it has been handy for a few other things as well

My 4-gallon air compressor cycles on at 100 psi and off at 130 psi, and only runs for 11-13 seconds every 30 minutes or so (I haven't actually timed it yet). Not too bad at all!

Adjusting the air pressure regulator to near-zero resulted in draft gauge readings down to 0.01" W.C.and lower. During testing I discovered that the readings varied signifigantly as the compressor cycled on and off, depending on whether the pressure was near the 100 psi level or more towards the 130 psi level. I decided to add the second regulator you see in the photos, and I set the compressor's regulator to 50 psi.

The draft gauge reading is now rather steady and and can still be be regulated down to even very low levels (.005"WC).

And for the smoke test...

After tuning the PID and doing a multi-level burn-in, I removed the gauge, hooked up the mailbox pipe and fired-up some pellets in the AMAZN 12" tube and...VIOLA!! A beautiful plume of smoke became visible from the venturi. I played with the regulator setting and watched the plume respond as expected, then opened the door to see good smoke distribution throughout the enclosure.

I was worried that creosote might condense at the outlet of the venturi, but I saw no such evidence of that happening, despite the sub 40-degree ambient temperature. I suspect I could get some condensation once it's loaded up with meat, athough the venturi stayed warm - but not hot not the whole time during testing. Only time will tell.

I am left with the notion that this rig will be very efficient with its use of smoke, so I will endeavour to generate only as much smoke as is needed, and move it through the smoker at a relatively slow rate to allow sufficient condensation/cleaning to occur. I see no reason to generate a excessive amount of smoke only to have to take additional steps to properly clean it before it goes into the smoker.

BTW - missing from the photos are the temporary alum foil plugs in the extra ports that I used during testing. I will be ordering silicone plugs very soon.

Seasoning smoke run will be next, then on to do some real smoking...I can't wait.

Thanks for reading -

John
 
Very cool... The second regulator was an awesome idea for stability.. My AMNPS consumes about 1.5 ounces per hour.. It will be interesting to see what your pellet consumption is...
The creosote should collect inside the MB and any tubing you have connected to it...

Creosote in my MB...

 
That venturi will be great if you cold smoke in it. I never cold smoked in anything insulated because I thought it would cut the time of cold smoking in half vs. cool heavy guage heat sink steel (grill.) Looks complicated like a WMD (weapon of mass destruction.)
-Kurt
 
Wow definitely a very cool project!

I've been debating on using a little computer fan over the vent of my MES to "suck" air up and out of the MES when doing no heat cold smokes, which I rarely do.

Your approach is way cooler... though I don't really need it for my digital MES. Maybe I'll post about the idea of using a little computer fan to pull/suck air up and out of the MES when it's not on for these cold smokes.
 
I was thinking about a 3" Y vent coupling and a fan as an exhaust vent venturi but can't find it in the store. I wanted to use it to prime my mailbox mod with the 3"× 8' aluminum flex pipe for cold smoking.
-Kutt
 
Thanks to all for the kind words.

The electric blower rig pictured below was my first experiment in pulling smoke through the smoker.
Made from posterboard, tape, hot glue, etc., and basically works on the same principal as the pneumatic version.
Powered it from the USB port on a jump-starter battery . Notice how the the blower itself never sees any heat or smoke.

Magnets taped inside the box hold it in place over the exhaust vent on the rear of my old gasser.
20171205_164440a.jpg

20171205_164125a.jpg

20171205_163842a.jpg


I think this 12 volt 10 CFM blower pulled much air (smoke) through, even when running on 5-volts, because the cheese cubes I cold-smoked for a short time tasted like they'd been rolled in an ashtray!!!

I suspect that despite using a mailbox with a long duct - the smoke never got the chance to linger in the duct and "get cleaned".

I added the speed control module later on, but never tried it again as I'd already moved on to the adjustable air-powered concept seen in the OP. Might still be worth trying though...

Thanks for reading -

John
 
The blower "may" have sped up the smoke column to the point it was a linear flow and didn't have the swirling a slower, meandering stream of smoke would have had... Good observation...
 
TBS is not so easy to photograph. I could barely see the TBS but the camera couldn't.

20171208_152413a.jpg


Had to wait for darkness and use a backlight.

Regulator adjusted to zero output (draft only) -

20171208_183014a.jpg


Regulator adjusted to very low output (my preference for cold smoking I think) -

20171208_182946a.jpg


Regulator adjusted to a higher output -

20171208_183000a.jpg


Burning dust in the AMNPS made from apple/maple blend pellets which were hand-ground using a Zassenhaus coffee grinder. (Hey - it's just what I had on-hand to work with). Placed in mailbox mod with about 10 feet of semi-rigid aluminum flex duct.

Ambient temp has been 30 F or less, used PID to hold internal temp to about 60 F while smoking mild cheddar cubes. Temp remains stable under current conditions.

Much smoke escaped immediately upon opening door-

20171208_183217a.jpg


1st sample tasted pretty good. Very encouraging so far. Still smokin'...

Thanks for reading -

John
 
Well...

I have an update for this project but I keep getting "internal server error" when I try to post with uploaded photos.

I dunno what I'm doin' wrong.
 
When I got that message, my pictures were too big... the easiest way to correct the situation is....
In my files, there is a resize option when I click on edit.. I resize 50%.. all seems to be OK... you may need to resize further...
 
I wouldn't think the size of my image files are what's preventing me from posting them.

They were each resized to less than 1000 x 1000 pixels and ranged from 181kb to 526kb filesizes. There were five images in total.

I captured the following error message (snip) which appears after trying to place the uploaded images (thumbnail or full sized) into the body of the reply text:

upload_2018-1-23_18-59-46.png


Oddly enough - it looks like it's going to let me paste this image directly into the reply text and then post. I had already tried doing this with the other images, but no joy :(

I still dunno what I'm missing here.

-John
 
I wouldn't think the size of my image files are what's preventing me from posting them.

They were each resized to less than 1000 x 1000 pixels and ranged from 181kb to 526kb filesizes. There were five images in total.

I captured the following error message (snip) which appears after trying to place the uploaded images (thumbnail or full sized) into the body of the reply text:

View attachment 351286

Oddly enough - it looks like it's going to let me paste this image directly into the reply text and then post. I had already tried doing this with the other images, but no joy :(

I still dunno what I'm missing here.

-John




That's the exact message I was getting when I was unable to get into my "Step by Steps" Index to do some editing.

Jeff & his Computer Elves fixed it.

Bear
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Hot Threads

Clicky