Boneless vs. Bone-in

  • Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
SMF is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

kramerbr

Newbie
Original poster
Jun 13, 2012
10
10
South Dakota
I have to cook up about 60 lbs of boneless pork butts tomorrow for a contest.  Each one is about 20 lbs.  I was planning to split them in half to get more bark and shorten the cook time but I was wondering how the cook time compares to bone-in?  I've never done boneless before.

Thanks in advance!
 
Nope , My friend ,you're right , it does take longer , but as you and I both do , use the bone - in for the 'Love' boost.
drool.gif


The ( built -in) Thermometer feature is a great gift from the 'Smoke gods' .

But in rectrospect , cook your boneless Buts , cut down as mentioned ( even 5# if you have room ?) for extra Bark.   The same way you would  a bone - in . probe -  in and to 200*F or so . . .

Also . . .continue to watch for the dreaded "STALL" (Duh - tuh - duuuh  )
icon_eek.gif


have fun . . .
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Latest posts

Hot Threads

Clicky